Recent posts

type	title	author	last post
Forum topic	Symmetric Cube Positions with more than 4 symmetries I've done an analysis of your by rokicki Symmetry reductions by Herbert Kociemba Symmetric search actually is by rokicki I think you mean less or equa by Herbert Kociemba Dan Hoey (a frequent contribu by Jerry Bryan Naming symmetries by rokicki Nice work!!! Are you going to by silviu	Herbert Kociemba	10/29/2010 - 08:21
Forum topic	Non trivial identities Dimension in group theory ? by Rafoo Distinction between Physical Models and Mathematical Models by Jerry Bryan h dimensional space by B MacKenzie If you look at this way then by mdlazreg Correct. At least that is my by mdlazreg Yes I know that there is no g by mdlazreg I see. Thanks. Mathematica by mdlazreg re. Parameter Space by B MacKenzie Another Clarification by Jerry Bryan A Clarification by Jerry Bryan Parameter Space by B MacKenzie I am not sure what you mean b by mdlazreg Yes, I have the same feeling, by mdlazreg I was unaware that analysis. by B MacKenzie Actually all identities at 12 by mdlazreg FU U R U R' F' U U L' U' L FF' by Jerry Bryan Yes I agree, the identity man by mdlazreg Simple Cycle or Unique Simple Cycle and Symmetry by Jerry Bryan Conjugate relationships by B MacKenzie Correction by Jerry Bryan Commutitive Identities by B MacKenzie I would consider them as non by mdlazreg I am not sure about your argu by mdlazreg Hopefully, I haven't messed u by Jerry Bryan Identities and Commutivity by B MacKenzie I consider the identities abo by mdlazreg I think your example of Pons by mdlazreg Sorry, but I would call the i by Herbert Kociemba Backwards by Jerry Bryan Yes I was talking about QTM. by mdlazreg In fact I am not able to gene by mdlazreg Antipodes and Non-trivial Identities by Jerry Bryan I was able to generate subopt by mdlazreg It is not difficult to add su by Herbert Kociemba While I am happy your code ge by mdlazreg I think I figured out how the by mdlazreg Identities and Duplicate Positions by Jerry Bryan I used U U' for the input. T by Herbert Kociemba Identities at higher level by mdlazreg With my QTM otimal solver I g by Herbert Kociemba	mdlazreg	06/01/2012 - 02:40
Forum topic	3-face subgroup of the 3x3x3 cube C2v Two Face Group Antipodes by B MacKenzie You're right - my table is wrong! by secondmouse Three Face Tree Expansion by B MacKenzie Possible errata by secondmouse Three Face (almost) three spot position by B MacKenzie Just to clarify... by secondmouse Three Face Group Distribution by B MacKenzie The second of these potential by secondmouse Deeper Table by B MacKenzie I think the largest analysis by Bruce Norskog Three face group by B MacKenzie	secondmouse	10/29/2010 - 07:16
Forum topic	2x2x2 Cube Connecting Cosets by B MacKenzie Void Cube by B MacKenzie We say the same things by brac37 Quotient Group by B MacKenzie To Group or Not to Group by B MacKenzie Your 2x2x2 is not a group by brac37 Antisymmetry and the 2x2x2 cube by B MacKenzie 2 x 2 x 2 Group Model by B MacKenzie 96 antisymmetries of the void corner cube by brac37	B MacKenzie	09/25/2014 - 13:19
Forum topic	Two more classes with exacly 4 symmetries done - most 20f* are antisymmetric Wow, good point! I tend to o by rokicki Thanks -- that's clearer. I by Mike G I can give you a stochastic a by rokicki First things first... by Mike G Great work! Of the 771 kno by rokicki	Herbert Kociemba	10/29/2010 - 08:16
Forum topic	U turn sans U turns I remember reading an old book by jcm re Five Face Puzzle by B MacKenzie There are shorter maneuvers f by kociemba	B MacKenzie	10/29/2010 - 07:41
Forum topic	Slice turn metric, anyone? Slice turn vs Axial Turn by rokicki SPTM (ATM) exact count by Andrew Gould Axial solutions by Andrew Gould The reason I showed the list by NoLongerUnsolve... Well, clearly your list has p by Bruce Norskog My counts for 3x3x3 with 27 nodes at depth 1 by NoLongerUnsolve... Nice by rokicki S6 cubes by Rafoo 18s by Rafoo Distance 18s's by rokicki SQTM? I prefer QSTM. by brac37 some axial metric numbers by Bruce Norskog Axes metric? by brac37 So let me add 11 by tscheunemann Confirmed! by rokicki some SQTM numbers by Bruce Norskog SQTM by rokicki Other metrics by Rafoo	rokicki	05/23/2018 - 18:33
Forum topic	4x4x4 upper bounds: 57 OBTM confirmed; 56 SST and 53 BT calculated. 4x4x4 new upper bound: 53 SSTM by CS I don't do stage 2 without br by CS How do you do stage 2 without by charlie 4x4x4 new upper bound: 55 OBTM by CS	rokicki	03/09/2015 - 10:43
Forum topic	The 4x4x4 can be solved in 79 moves (STM) Stage 4 details and symmetry-reduced results by Bruce Norskog	Bruce Norskog	10/29/2010 - 08:11
Forum topic	100,000 cubes optimally solved Adding Branching Factors to the Mix by Jerry Bryan Matches by rokicki	kociemba	10/29/2010 - 07:37
first page previous page ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... next page last page